Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II Review: A New Benchmark
Lighter than the original by nearly 30%, faster-focusing, and visibly sharper. The new telephoto zoom to beat.
Head to head
A direct, no-fluff comparison: specs, pros and cons, pricing, and the scenarios where each one earns its keep.
| Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR II | Sony FE 50mm f/1.4 GM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $1199 | $1298 |
| Our rating | 4.7/5 | 4.8/5 |
| Category | camera-lenses | camera-lenses |
| Pros | 3 | 4 |
| Cons | 2 | 2 |
Pros
Cons
Pros
Cons
Inferred from each camera's pros and review focus. Treat as a starting point, then read the full reviews for nuance.
It depends on what you shoot. Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR II scores 4.7/5 in our review, while the Sony FE 50mm f/1.4 GM scores 4.8/5. See the spec table and use-case breakdown above for our verdict.
Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR II sells around $1199, and Sony FE 50mm f/1.4 GM around $1298. The Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR II is the cheaper of the two.
Both are capable, but beginners usually do better with whichever has the simpler interface and more forgiving autofocus. Read the "Winner by use case" section above for our specific call.
Only if the gap in features you actually use is wide. If you already own one, the marginal upgrade is rarely worth the cost unless a specific shortcoming is blocking your work.
Lighter than the original by nearly 30%, faster-focusing, and visibly sharper. The new telephoto zoom to beat.
Tamron's second-gen 28-75 is the lens to beat under $1000. Fast, sharp, and shockingly light.
Sigma's Art-line redesign for mirrorless brings the 35mm classic into the modern era at a price that undercuts the first-party options.