Review
Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR II Review: APS-C's Best Standard Zoom
The redesigned 16-55 finally adds OIS and trims weight, making it the obvious choice for Fuji X shooters.
4.7
Head to head
Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM vs Kodak PixPro FZ55
A direct, no-fluff comparison: specs, pros and cons, pricing, and the scenarios where each one earns its keep.
Spec snapshot
| Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM | Kodak PixPro FZ55 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $2899 | $129 |
| Our rating | 4.7/5 | 4/5 |
| Category | camera-lenses | cameras |
| Pros | 3 | 4 |
| Cons | 2 | 4 |
The case for each
Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM
4.7
Pros
- +500mm reach in a manageable size
- +Sharp throughout zoom
- +5-stop IS
Cons
- −Variable aperture
- −Slow at 500mm in low light
Kodak PixPro FZ55
4.0
Pros
- +Genuinely affordable
- +Real 5x optical zoom
- +Pocketable and light
- +Uses cheap AA-style rechargeable
Cons
- −Small sensor, weak low light
- −JPEG-only, no RAW
- −Plasticky build
- −Screen hard to see in sun
Winner by use case
Vlogging & videoCanon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM
Low-light photographyCanon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM
Value for moneyCanon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM
Pro & enterprise useTie
BeginnersTie
Inferred from each camera's pros and review focus. Treat as a starting point, then read the full reviews for nuance.
Common questions
Is the Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM better than the Kodak PixPro FZ55?
It depends on what you shoot. Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM scores 4.7/5 in our review, while the Kodak PixPro FZ55 scores 4/5. See the spec table and use-case breakdown above for our verdict.
Which is cheaper, the Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM or the Kodak PixPro FZ55?
Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM sells around $2899, and Kodak PixPro FZ55 around $129. The Kodak PixPro FZ55 is the cheaper of the two.
Which one is better for beginners?
Both are capable, but beginners usually do better with whichever has the simpler interface and more forgiving autofocus. Read the "Winner by use case" section above for our specific call.
Should I upgrade from the Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM to the Kodak PixPro FZ55?
Only if the gap in features you actually use is wide. If you already own one, the marginal upgrade is rarely worth the cost unless a specific shortcoming is blocking your work.
More in this category
Review
Sony FE 50mm f/1.4 GM Review: The New Portrait King for Sony
A lighter, sharper, faster-focusing 50mm GM that finally gives Sony shooters the no-compromise nifty-fifty they've been waiting for.
4.8
Review
Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II Review: A New Benchmark
Lighter than the original by nearly 30%, faster-focusing, and visibly sharper. The new telephoto zoom to beat.
4.9