Review

Kodak PixPro FZ55 Review: A $130 Camera That Beats Your Phone (Sometimes)

By K. Denise Washington

A pocketable 16MP point-and-shoot with 5x optical zoom for under $150. Here's what you actually get for the money.

4.0
Kodak PixPro FZ55 Review: A $130 Camera That Beats Your Phone (Sometimes)

Affiliate disclosure: Lenseland may earn a commission on purchases made through links in this article. Learn more.

What it is

The Kodak PixPro FZ55 is an entry-level pocket compact camera — a small, lightweight point-and-shoot with a 16-megapixel 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor, a 5x optical zoom lens covering a 28–140mm equivalent range, and a 2.7-inch fixed LCD on the back. It records 1080p video, runs on a removable rechargeable battery, and is sold at a price point ($129–$149) that no major camera brand currently targets.

It is not a hybrid camera, a vlogging camera, or a content-creator camera. It is a budget point-and-shoot in the traditional sense.

Who it's for

  • Buyers who want a dedicated camera for kids, classroom, or travel without giving them a smartphone.
  • Anyone who wants a cheap second camera to keep in a glovebox or backpack.
  • Buyers attracted to the retro point-and-shoot aesthetic who don't want to pay used-market prices for vintage Canon or Sony compacts.

It is a poor fit for anyone who already owns a recent smartphone and expects equivalent image quality — that is not what this category delivers.

Key specs and how they compare

According to Kodak/JK Imaging's published specifications: 16MP 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor, 5x optical zoom (28–140mm equivalent), f/3.9–6.3 lens, 1080p/30 video, 2.7-inch LCD, AA-style rechargeable battery, no electronic viewfinder, no RAW capture, JPEG only.

At its ~$129 price the FZ55 has essentially no direct equivalents from Canon, Sony, Nikon, or Fujifilm — they have all exited the budget compact segment. The most cited comparisons in published reviews are:

  • Used Canon PowerShot ELPH 180/190 (~$80–$150 used) — similar sensor class, often cheaper on the used market, but no warranty.
  • Modern smartphones ($300+) — larger sensors, computational photography, and faster lenses; better in nearly every image-quality category, but not pocketable as a dedicated camera.
  • Kodak PixPro AZ405 (~$199) — same brand, larger superzoom body, 40x zoom; better reach but bulkier.

The FZ55's specific advantage is being one of the only new, warrantied compacts available at this price.

What reviewers and buyers are saying

Coverage from budget-camera reviewers on YouTube and write-ups from sites focused on entry-level gear converges on a consistent picture: in good daylight, the camera produces serviceable 16MP JPEGs with a slightly soft, slightly noisy look that some buyers explicitly want for a "Y2K compact" aesthetic. In low light, results degrade quickly — noise is heavy above ISO 400 and the lens is slow.

Buyer feedback on Amazon and Target reports realistic satisfaction when expectations are set correctly: parents buying it as a kid's first camera, teenagers buying it for a film-camera-style look, and travelers buying it as a backup are generally positive. Negative reviews almost always come from buyers expecting smartphone-class results, plus recurring complaints about plastic build quality and a screen that is hard to see in direct sunlight.

Value for the price

At $129, industry consensus indicates the PixPro FZ55 is honest about what it is: a basic point-and-shoot at a basic point-and-shoot price. Buyers who understand the category — and who specifically want a separate, simple camera rather than a phone — generally find it a reasonable purchase.

For buyers expecting image quality competitive with a modern smartphone, every published review and buyer-feedback pattern points the same direction: spend more, or use the phone. The FZ55 makes sense as a kid's camera, a glovebox spare, or an aesthetic-driven purchase — not as a primary photography tool.

What we love

  • Genuinely affordable
  • Real 5x optical zoom
  • Pocketable and light
  • Uses cheap AA-style rechargeable

Where it falls short

  • Small sensor, weak low light
  • JPEG-only, no RAW
  • Plasticky build
  • Screen hard to see in sun

FAQ

Is it better than my iPhone?

For zoom shots in daylight, yes. For low light or video, no — modern phones win.

Good for kids?

Excellent. Cheap enough that drops aren't a tragedy, simple enough for an 8-year-old.

Does it shoot video?

720p only. Skip it if video matters to you.

Like this review?

Get the next one in your inbox.

Keep reading